Local business? Support local news on PrincetonWeekly.news

Back to Texas

League City voters will be the first in Texas to decide whether police keep their Flock cameras

The Houston-area city's council has pledged to take down its 55 license plate cameras if Proposition A fails Tuesday. Kyle and Laredo plan similar votes in May.

Gwen Mercer· AI-assisted, edited by Jake Team

October 30, 20262 min read

privacy vs security - illustration, Jake Team LLC

Voters in League City, a Houston-area suburb of about 120,000, decide Tuesday whether their police department should keep using Flock license plate cameras, the first such vote in Texas, The Texas Tribune reports.

Proposition A covers 55 cameras along public roads that record every passing vehicle, capturing plate numbers along with make, model, color and identifying details such as dents and bumper stickers.

The measure was first meant to measure public opinion and is labeled nonbinding. But in mid-October the City Council passed a second resolution promising to remove the cameras if voters say no. Mayor Nick Long said at the Oct. 13 meeting that no second vote would be needed, and that 72 hours after the result is certified "the city will start bagging them up."

Both sides

Long told the Tribune he put the question on the ballot because residents of every political leaning were on each side. He credited the cameras in a recent missing-person case, saying police "wouldn't have had anything to go on" without them, while also acknowledging the privacy worries.

"They definitely work, and they definitely have privacy concerns, so I think both things can be true," he said.

Flock Safety said it would respect whatever the city decides. A company spokesperson pointed to arrests in the area, including a murder suspect, and said the cameras have "had a real impact on crime in League City."

Critics, including state and federal lawmakers from both parties, have called the cameras unconstitutional and open to abuse, and some state legislators have said they will file bills next session to ban or regulate them. Five police departments in the Houston area, among them neighboring Pasadena and Baytown, have arrested officers or opened investigations over alleged misuse of Flock data, the Tribune reported.

How the data is used

Only six League City officers can get into the system, and two must work together to run a search, according to the mayor. He said his larger worry is what happens once the data leaves the city and sits on remote servers.

The city's Flock transparency portal shows more than 400 agencies can search League City's camera data, all of them in Texas except the FBI. Local police run searches about 200 times in a typical 30-day stretch.

Elsewhere

Gov. Greg Abbott in August barred state money from paying for Flock cameras and stopped new installations along state roads, without saying how long those limits would last. Kyle and Laredo plan to put the question to their own voters in May, and York, Maine, is holding a similar vote Tuesday.

League City has kept its cameras running ahead of the election, while York has covered its cameras until the result is in.

Sources

The Texas Tribune

Share

Gwen Mercer· AI-assisted, edited by Jake Team

Gwen Mercer writes about community life, schools, public safety, and local events in Princeton.

Related Stories

More in Sport

Sport

Dallas kept scoring after Flagg’s last point

The Mavericks’ reserves outscored Oklahoma City’s bench 43-19 in a 120-96 win, preserving Dallas’ separation as Cooper Flagg’s scoring ended after three quarters.

Hart NashOctober 29, 20264 min read