Local business? Support local news on PrincetonWeekly.news

Back to Texas

Appeals court rules immigrants held by ICE in Texas have no right to a bond hearing, in a 10-7 decision

The full 5th Circuit sided with the Trump administration's July 2025 no-bond policy in a case brought by three men arrested in Texas traffic stops. Lawyers for the men say the ruling hollows out due process in Texas, Louisiana and Mississippi.

Gwen Mercer· AI-assisted, edited by Jake Team

October 24, 20262 min read

Immigration law - illustration, Jake Team LLC

Immigrants who entered the country illegally can be held in federal custody until they are deported, with no right to ask a judge for bond, the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled Friday.

The New Orleans-based court split 10-7, The Texas Tribune reported. The decision applies in Texas, Louisiana and Mississippi, the three states in the 5th Circuit.

Judge Cory Wilson, appointed by President Donald Trump, wrote for the majority that people who were never legally admitted are entitled only to the rights Congress has written into immigration law. Detainees who want out of custody, he wrote, "can do so at any moment by agreeing to leave the country." Judge Andrew Oldham agreed in a separate opinion.

In dissent, Judge Leslie Southwick, an appointee of President George W. Bush, wrote that the ruling builds an "impenetrable wall between the Constitution and these long-term residents."

Three Texas traffic stops

The case began with three men stopped by state troopers on Texas roads between November 2025 and February 2026. Each had lived in the U.S. for at least 14 years, had worked during that time and has children who are U.S. citizens, according to the Tribune. Troopers handed them to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, which detained them without a hearing before a judge.

Federal district judges later ordered the men released, finding that holding them without a chance at bond violated due process. The administration appealed, relying on a policy it announced in July 2025 that anyone arrested by ICE, however long they have lived in the country, has no right to bond.

Reaction

A Department of Homeland Security lawyer, James Percival, called the ruling a "big win" on social media and said mandatory detention was written into a 1996 law.

Rebecca Cassler of the American Immigration Council, who argued the case, said the decision leaves the right to due process "hollow for immigrants in Texas, Louisiana, and Mississippi." Gracie Willis of the National Immigration Project, which represents the three men, said her group has not decided whether to ask the U.S. Supreme Court to step in.

The Supreme Court agreed earlier this month to hear a separate case that challenges the same detention policy, the Tribune reported. Many district judges have ruled that detainees are entitled to bond unless they are a flight risk or a danger to the community, and lawyers are watching how those courts respond to Friday's decision.

The ruling does not stop immigrants who entered the country legally from filing habeas corpus petitions to challenge their detention, according to the Tribune.

Sources

The Texas Tribune

Share

Gwen Mercer· AI-assisted, edited by Jake Team

Gwen Mercer writes about community life, schools, public safety, and local events in Princeton.

Related Stories

More in Sport