Back to Texas

A $2.3 million records bill shows how hard Flock camera data has become to see in Texas

North Richland Hills quoted a privacy advocate $2.3 million for records about its Flock license plate cameras, the Texas Tribune reports, as state agencies and cities also hold back data on where cameras sit and how police search them.

Gwen Mercer

October 5, 20263 min read

Roadside camera and paperwork - illustration, Jake Team LLC

A North Texas city has told a privacy advocate he must pay about $2.3 million up front before it will search for records on how its police use Flock Safety license plate cameras, according to a Texas Tribune report published Monday.

The invoice from North Richland Hills, a Fort Worth suburb, priced the work at $15 an hour, which the Tribune calculated as more than 14 years of labor to comb through roughly a terabyte of messages about mistakes, misuse and whether the system works. A city spokesperson confirmed the invoice to the Tribune but would not answer questions.

The request came from a man who goes by the pseudonym Phil Mynona and leads the Texas Privacy Coalition, which opposes mass surveillance. He told the Tribune he has filed close to identical requests with nearly 200 police and sheriff's departments.

The highest bill he had seen before this one was about $5,000, from Victoria, he said, and he called the North Richland Hills figure ludicrous.

Same records, very different prices

The Tribune found wide gaps in how agencies treat these requests. Sealy, a small city west of Houston, released more than 400,000 pages for free, according to the advocate. Houston station KPRC reported being quoted $121,000 by the Harris County Sheriff's Office. Irving wants $70,000 for records Carrollton provided at no cost, according to the conservative site Current Revolt, as cited by the Tribune.

State agencies have also pulled back. The Tribune said the Department of Public Safety gave it a full list of searches on its Flock network in July, including those by outside agencies, but limited a second release in August to its own searches and then asked the attorney general's office for permission to withhold the data entirely.

DPS operates over 900 of the roughly 13,000 Flock cameras thought to be in use statewide. TxDOT, the agency that issues permits for plate readers along state highways, declined to say how many it has approved or where, citing public safety in a challenge to the attorney general.

Why the records matter to both sides

Besides plate numbers, the cameras record a vehicle's make and model and features like stickers or body damage, and an officer can query cameras belonging to hundreds of departments in one search. The company leaves disclosure decisions to the agencies that buy the cameras. A Flock spokesperson told the Tribune its transparency portals give agencies a public way to share policies, usage and access rules.

The Tribune counted 59 Texas agencies using those portals, covering more than 2,600 cameras, and only 16 that publish their search records. Some departments go further on their own: Live Oak, near San Antonio, posts an interactive map of its camera locations, and Corinth, in Denton County, lists the streets where its cameras sit.

Public records have driven recent accountability cases. A USA Today request led to an investigation of the Lufkin Police Department, where an officer who admitted to 100 felony counts of using the cameras to stalk people was sentenced last week to five years in prison, the Tribune reported.

Gov. Greg Abbott cited that case when he blocked state funding for the cameras in August and paused some installations in September.

Sources

ksat.com

click2houston.com

Share

Gwen Mercer

Gwen Mercer writes about community life, schools, public safety, and local events in Princeton.

Related Stories

More in Sport